The city of Kyoto has unveiled a controversial plan aimed at alleviating the strain on its infrastructure caused by the influx of tourists. The proposal has sparked a division among residents and travel companies, with some hailing it as a necessary step to reduce overtourism, while others warn that it might drive visitors to neighboring cities. As Japan's weak yen continues to make it an attractive destination for international travelers, the city faces the challenge of balancing tourism benefits with local impacts.
Kyoto's government seeks to address the problem of overtourism, particularly during peak seasons, by implementing strategies that could ease the burden on its infrastructure. However, opinions diverge on whether this approach will achieve its intended outcomes. Supporters believe the plan will effectively manage tourist numbers within the city limits. Critics argue that visitors, especially foreign tourists, may choose to stay in nearby cities like Osaka and make day trips to Kyoto, thereby circumventing any intended relief.
Masaru Takayama, a prominent voice in local tourism discussions, raises concerns regarding the possible unintended consequences of the plan. He suggests that while overtourism is indeed an issue, the strategy may not lead to a significant reduction in tourist numbers.
“Yes, overtourism is a problem in many parts of Kyoto and at particular times of the year, but I am sure that foreign tourists will very quickly realise they can stay in a neighbouring city or town and just visit Kyoto for the day.” – Masaru Takayama
Takayama also points out potential economic drawbacks for local businesses.
“That will not be good for hotel operators and will not effectively reduce the number of tourists [in Kyoto],” – Masaru Takayama
The plan also raises concerns about its impact on domestic tourism. With Japan remaining a relatively affordable destination for foreigners due to the weak yen, Japanese citizens could find travel costs comparatively higher under the new measures. This economic shift may lead to a decline in domestic visitors, further complicating local tourism dynamics.
“The plan is inevitably going to affect domestic tourists as well,” – Masaru Takayama
As the city moves forward with its plans, it must navigate these conflicting perspectives and potential pitfalls. The success of the initiative will depend heavily on how effectively it addresses both international and domestic tourism dynamics while securing the support of local stakeholders.
Leave a Reply