At the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 21, Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang emphasized that "trade war has no winners," reflecting the ongoing complexities of the U.S.-China trade tensions. The U.S. is currently investigating China's trade practices, including allegations of unfair trade practices and currency manipulation, which have prompted a strategic response from Beijing. The U.S. has until April 1 to submit its findings and recommendations, a deadline that could potentially reshape the dynamics of international trade relations.
China's State Administration for Market Regulation plans to advance antitrust enforcement by 2025, aiming to safeguard its economic interests and security. Meanwhile, former U.S. President Donald Trump described tariff threats as "a tremendous power over China" during an interview on January 23. These developments underscore the delicate balance between imposing economic pressures and maintaining diplomatic channels.
The U.S.-China trade relationship, already strained by disputes over semiconductor production and technology access, faces additional challenges. Chinese semiconductor plants currently produce about 15% of the world's output, but projections suggest that this capacity will more than double in the next five to seven years. This growth aligns with China's push for semiconductor self-sufficiency and the U.S.'s efforts to block China's access to advanced chip-making technology, both pivotal factors in the ongoing trade conflict.
On January 16, China's commerce ministry initiated a probe into U.S. chip exports to determine whether American chipmakers are unfairly advantaged through incentives and grants. This investigation highlights China's cautious yet assertive approach to addressing perceived inequities in trade practices.
In response to these dynamics, Trump has ordered an evaluation of U.S. trade policy, potentially paving the way for new tariffs. This move reflects a calculated strategy rather than a softened stance on China, according to industry experts like Gary Ng, who noted, "It's more like a change in tactic rather than Trump having a softer stance on China."
"Protectionism leads nowhere. (A) trade war has no winners," – Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang
Beijing's potential to retaliate with tariffs on U.S. goods remains a looming possibility, although it has refrained from such actions thus far. The tiny yet powerful semiconductors at the center of this trade war illustrate the complexities of modern global economic interdependencies.
"they don't want them, and I'd rather not have to use it" – Donald Trump
Chen Qiheng suggests that China's most potent weapon against trade pressures is to maintain openness, stating, "The most powerful weapon China (can use) to fight back is to stay open." The sheer demand of China's economy for foreign products and services acts as a gravitational force, preventing even strategic competitors from straying too far apart.
"The sheer demand of its economy for foreign products and services will be a gravitational force to prevent even strategic competitors from straying too far apart." – Chen Qiheng
Jing Qian adds that China's actions form part of a broader strategy to unsettle U.S. businesses and influence policymaker decisions. However, heightened compliance costs, regulatory unpredictability, and fears of arbitrary enforcement may deter foreign investment and hinder technological collaboration, potentially undermining China's long-term objectives.
"These actions are part of a broader strategy to unsettle US businesses and influence policymaker decisions," – Jing Qian
"Heightened compliance costs, regulatory unpredictability and fears of arbitrary enforcement may deter foreign investment and hinder technological collaboration, potentially undermining China’s long-term objectives," – Jing Qian
Gary Ng points out that Trump's use of tariffs has been effective as a negotiating tool. "If we look at the way that he uses tariffs as a tool right now, he seems to achieve a lot of objectives before even using the tariff because other countries would basically agree to talk to him," he explained.
"If we look at the way that he uses tariffs as a tool right now, he seems to achieve a lot of objectives before even using the tariff because other countries would basically agree to talk to him" – Gary Ng
Leave a Reply