The European Union's ongoing struggle against corporate tax avoidance has come under scrutiny, with a recent report revealing significant shortcomings in enforcement and sanctions. The European Commission previously ordered Apple to repay €13 billion in taxes to Ireland, arguing that the deal constituted an unlawful subsidy. However, efforts to curb such corporate strategies have been hampered by a lack of uniformity among member states and inconsistent sanctions.
The European Court of Auditors highlighted that corporate profit-shifting jeopardizes one-fifth of corporation tax revenues, amounting to approximately €100 billion. Despite the existence of an EU tax blacklist, which currently includes 11 countries such as Russia, Panama, and the US Virgin Islands, the list lacks effective enforcement measures. This is largely due to the inconsistent sanctions imposed by EU members, rendering the blacklist less effective in deterring harmful tax practices.
Tax advisors are mandated by the EU's administrative cooperation law, in effect since 2020, to disclose details of tax avoidance schemes they market. These disclosures are intended to be shared among national tax authorities. Nevertheless, the report indicated that only 16% of these reports were utilized by tax administrations for further investigation.
“The high level of flexibility of this approach may limit the deterrent effect of the defensive measures and engenders the risk that companies will set up their businesses in member states that apply fewer legislative measures,” – Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz
The EU's fight against tax-dodging is further complicated by the decentralized nature of its decision-making processes. Each of the 27 member states has a veto over EU tax plans, posing a significant challenge to implementing cohesive and effective tax policies. This fragmentation has also led to the rejection of proposals from the Commission to extend tax monitoring to personal taxes.
“Harmful tax regimes and corporate tax avoidance pose major challenges to ensuring that taxes are paid where profits are made,” – Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz
The role of Wopke Hoekstra as the new head of tax issues for the EU executive adds another layer of complexity. Hoekstra's involvement in a tax-planning scandal has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest in his efforts to address these pervasive challenges.
“The European Commission needs to plug loopholes in the EU tax toolbox,” – Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz
Efforts to tackle corporate tax avoidance continue to be a high priority for the EU. However, overcoming the existing barriers is crucial for ensuring fair tax competition across the bloc. The Commission remains committed to addressing these issues but recognizes the necessity for more robust and coordinated actions among member states.
“Tackling tax avoidance and ensuring fair tax competition continues to be a key EU priority,” – The Commission
Leave a Reply