Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter (now X) and Square (now Block), recently ignited a heated debate surrounding intellectual property law. He announced on Twitter, “delete all IP law.” This provocative statement immediately turned heads and has led to energetic debate all over the internet. Dorsey, who lives in New York City, comes from an extraordinary background of journalism and technology. He was formerly a technology reporter with Adweek and was senior editor at VentureBeat.
More recently, Dorsey’s suggestion to abolish intellectual property (IP) law left many reeling. This was surprising, considering his past support of not enforcing patents against companies that use them in a good faith manner. His position is in line with a wider trend within the tech industry that is calling the value of traditional IP protections into question. The former CEO of Twitter was a principal mover in the creation of the open social media project that later became Bluesky. He soon got disillusioned with the initiative and then quit its board.
Twitter CEO Elon Musk (with his Twitter hat on) endorsed Dorsey’s pithy suggestion in response, opining “I agree!” It has encouraged and added fresh fire to debates about what these kinds of opinions mean for the future of the creative industry. Critics quickly emerged, challenging the duo’s perspectives. Ed Newton-Rex commented on the exchange, stating, “Tech execs declaring all-out war on creators who don’t want their life’s work pillaged for profit.”
The debate over Dorsey’s statements has understandably caused panic among those working in creative industries. Lincoln Michel pointed out that “none of Jack or Elon’s companies would exist without IP law,” emphasizing the foundational role that intellectual property has played in fostering innovation within the tech sector. Nicole Shanahan added to the conversation, stating, “IP law is the only thing separating human creations from AI creations,” highlighting the vital distinction between human-made content and AI-generated works.
Shanahan extended an invitation for discussion regarding reforming IP laws, saying, “If you want to reform it, let’s talk!” Her comments indicate an openness to voice conversations on building something better as opposed to completely discounting structures already in place.
Leave a Reply