Former President Donald Trump raised eyebrows everywhere at a recent campaign rally. He went so far as to draw a memorable comparison to the notorious fictional psycho Hannibal Lecter. Lecter, as conceived by author Thomas Harris, has had a remarkable role in popular culture. Since The Silence of the Lambs burst onto the silver screen more than thirty years ago, ghoulish masters of manipulation such as Anthony Hopkins, Brian Cox, and most recently Mads Mikkelsen have immortalized his character in an array of adaptations.
Despite Lecter’s murderous ways, in his speech Trump praised Lecter as “a wonderful man,” and called him “the late, great Hannibal Lecter.” He made some powerful comparisons between that character and today’s migrants. He said, “You all seen Silence of the Lambs? The late, great Hannibal Lecter would just love to have you for dinner!” Then he went on to say, “It’s nuts! Insane asylums are releasing all their patients.” Such statements have prompted discussions about the implications of using a character known for his devilish charm and intellect to demonize vulnerable populations.
Hannibal Lecter may be the most famous character from Harris’ books, having appeared in five movies and one TV show—all won or nominated for Academy Awards and Emmys, respectively. His most famous performance was in The Silence of the Lambs. In the book’s most unforgettable scene, he explains to FBI trainee Clarice Starling, “Discourtesy is unspeakably ugly to me.” The character’s blend of sophisticated manners and horrific tendencies has made him a lasting symbol of horror in American cinema.
Trump’s comments during his rally in May were not only shocking but highlighted the former president’s tendency to use provocative language to engage his audience. Trump once compared migrants to Hannibal Lecter, suggesting they should be controlled because they are dangerous predators who would eat our faces off. This story has already been rightfully criticized for perpetuating fear over promoting education.
Anthony Hopkins, who played Lecter in three films, was freaked out by Trump’s comments. While he understood the cultural significance of the character, he noted that he wanted to wash his hands of the political ramifications. Hannibal, that’s a long time ago that film. Geez, that was more than 30 years ago. I’m just shocked and appalled with what you’ve told me about Trump,” he said.
This allusion to a fictional character representing both brilliance and evil genius begs the question, how attuned is Trump to cultural context? Critics say that to use a character that honks such a figure to describe actual real-life people shows a serious lack of cultural sensitivity.
The Silence of the Lambs traumatized viewers with its taut, frightening turns. This idea has rightfully made the film a touchstone of horror and a classic for all time. Trump uses Lecter in his campaign discourse, but for a different reason. By doing so, he seeks to ignite further division rather than promote any form of healing.
During his rally, Trump addressed broader societal issues, stating, “running to be president for all of America, not half of America, because there is no victory in winning for half of America.” This appeal to solidarity does not match with his alarming rhetoric that’s typical of Hannibal Lecter. His remarks reflect a deliberate, sophisticated plan to mix calls for oneness with inflammatory, separating rhetoric.
The political landscape is dynamic and ever-shifting. When one considers Trump’s unique style of rhetoric, it incites a greater debate and discussion. His inflammatory comments bring out the worst of both his ardent supporters and virulent critics alike, emphasizing just how divided American politics has become lately.
Her immediate response from all quarters paints a picture not just of what we as a society will tolerate in a public servant. Most Americans wouldn’t hesitate to call Trump’s reference to Hannibal Lecter a fearmongering scare tactic. It seeks to catalyze ill-will towards marginalized people, first and foremost migrants. He’s known for employing provocative metaphors and similes to drive home his beliefs. This strategy is right in line with his past practice.
Leave a Reply