Following the Pulwama attack, India started a major escalation of their multi-decade conflict with neighboring Pakistan, carrying out air strikes in the Pakistan controlled region of Kashmir. The strikes were purportedly aimed at terrorist training camps. They have resulted in tremendous civilian casualties, with Pakistan asserting that 26 of their civilians, including women and children, were killed in multiple sites. This recent escalation further underscores the precarious nature of India-Pakistan ties. It is imperative that both nations have robust bilateral mechanisms for de-escalation, but as of now, both do not.
The air strikes came on a particularly tense day. Pakistan’s military spokesperson, Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif, reported that five Indian fighter jets were downed within Pakistani airspace as part of the military’s response to India’s actions. This dangerous cycle of retaliation not only threatens to expand this current conflict but raises the specter of a new major war in the region.
Casualties and Civilian Impact
In the wake of India’s air strikes, the human cost to civilian life has been enormous. Pakistan’s National Security Committee called the attacks unprovoked and unjustified. They pointed to the heartbreaking casualties of the innocent men, women and children killed in these reckless acts of violence. The committee condemned the strikes as a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty, asserting that India acted “on the false pretext of the presence of imaginary terrorist camps.”
Beyond the loss of life discussed above, the strikes allegedly hit civilian infrastructure, even mosques. Such moves have triggered international outcry and escalated concerns about the safety and security of civilians in the area.
“These unprovoked and unjustified attacks martyred innocent men, women and children.” – Pakistan’s National Security Committee
In face of these illegal moves, Pakistan’s National Security Committee of the Cabinet declared that India has set off “an inferno in the region.” Even as this violence has worried the international community and sparked calls to protect civilians, further military action has seemed inevitable.
Military Responses and International Reactions
The air strike left about 300 dead Pakistani armed forces prepared to respond after Indian attacks. They’ve been empowered to retaliate and avenge what they consider to be an assault on their sovereignty. The government affirmed that it reserves the right to respond “in self-defense, at a time, place, and manner of its choosing.” This announcement suggests that Pakistan is preparing to take counter-retaliatory actions soon.
The perfect storm created by the timing of all these events has resulted in widespread disruptions to regional air traffic. Over two dozen international flights have been diverted to avoid entering Pakistani airspace, highlighting the broader impact of this conflict on global travel and commerce.
International reactions to the situation have varied. China’s government expressed regret over India’s military operation, emphasizing its opposition to all forms of terrorism while urging both nations to act in the larger interest of peace and stability.
“China finds India’s military operation early this morning regrettable.” – Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson
Calls for restraint have come from Australia, where a spokesperson for Foreign Minister Penny Wong stated, “We don’t want to see escalatory actions, which pose a risk to regional peace and security.” Statements like these demonstrate an increasing concern from the international community over the risk for conflict escalation.
The Path Forward
As East-West tensions grow unabated, the demand for dialogue and war prevention will only be more pressing. The united front on both sides leaves little room for compromise. India has repeatedly confirmed that its strikes were necessary to deal with security threats associated with IEDs allegedly placed by terrorists.
Pakistan’s government has been adamant that India’s military escalations constitute unprovoked provocations that endanger regional stability. Continuing the current traumatic cycle of violence not only puts all participants in serious danger. More importantly, it affects the larger geopolitical dynamics of South Asia.
Leave a Reply