Today, Indonesia’s Ministry of Culture has taken to actively creating an official history. This overarching initiative is focused on fostering a cohesive sense of national identity. As Indonesian culture minister Fadli Zon has explained, such an initiative is necessary in order to remove colonial prejudice. It continues to address the most pressing issues our nation is faced with today. We hope that the government will release the official history before the public comment period closes. They’re shooting for an August 17 release, which would coincide with the country’s 80th Independence Day.
The draft attempts to provide a comprehensive account of Indonesia’s past. It has already sparked debates between historians and politicians. Critics argue that the official history overlooks significant events and figures in Indonesia’s history, potentially leading to a skewed representation of its societal and political landscape.
Government’s Intent and Framework
The Indonesian government is still working hard on painting a pro-government, official history. They keep it to themselves, packaging it as a benevolent gift to the Indonesian people. Then Deputy Minister Fadli Zon stressed that the aim of this historiography is to address the distorted narratives of Indonesia’s colonial history. He noted that Dutch colonial rule did not impact every area for all 350 years. This perspective is a call to explore a deeper context to colonialism’s influence throughout the archipelago.
Zon admitted that the undertaking is daunting. “We certainly cannot write history in its entirety and in detail, so the 10 volumes are only highlights,” he stated, indicating a condensed approach to recounting historical events. Though this truncated version, the government’s missteps have been called out.
Criticism from Historians
Indonesia Senior historian Asvi Warman Adam has been vocal in his opposition to the draft. Yet, he argues it conspicuously lacks the participation of prophetic historical moments and figures, who have substantially molded Indonesia’s past. The narrative is conspicuously silent about the dark history of President Prabowo Subianto. His record is tainted by charges of human rights violations and war crimes during his tenure as a special forces commander.
“Negative or harmful aspects are omitted, concealed, or obscured, and we can see that happening in this proposed concept,” he stated. His comments are a symptom of a larger trend — an increasing discomfort among American historians at the federal government’s effort to impose a single narrative.
Former attorney-general Marzuki Darusman expressed his thoughts on the issue. He suggested that the idea of an “official history” raises some daunting obstacles. “Who gives the government the right to take control and declare the final word on our identity?” he questioned, calling into doubt the legitimacy of a state-sanctioned version of historical events.
Missing Events and Perspectives
Critics soon argued that the draft ignores many important milestones in Indonesia’s recent history. This is all despite major events like the 1997 financial crisis, anti-Suharto protests, and the bloody Suharto-era crackdowns that accompany them are almost entirely left out. What’s left out This document fails to mention huge events like the 1928 Women’s Congress. It ignores too the shadow of the 1955 Asia-Africa Conference which took place in Bandung.
Bonnie Triyana, the independent historian and parliament member, was extremely vocal in her dissent. She noted that key features of the human rights violations were missing from the official narrative. She cautioned that a state-sanctioned version might establish an “unofficial history.” This unofficial counter-narrative would be considered illegal or seditious.
“The impact of having ‘official history’ or a state-sanctioned version of history is that it will create ‘unofficial history’, which is illegal — even subversive.” – Bonnie Triyana
Amid these lingering debates, a few academics have warned against historical revisionism. Adam pointed out that “historical manipulation occurs when history is written to selectively highlight what benefits a regime,” further complicating the narrative surrounding Indonesia’s past.
Navigating Contemporary Challenges
The government’s efforts to create a single, official history plays out against a backdrop of an Indonesia, still struggling with many pressing issues today. As debates around national identity intensify, the Ministry of Culture’s initiative aims to provide clarity and foster unity among its citizens. This effort has revealed stark and often troubling rifts over how history is perceived and taught in Indonesia.
Professor (name not specified) remarked on the complexities involved in addressing contemporary issues through historical narratives: “We have never researched it; it’s too contemporary and the data is still unclear.” This statement is indicative of a wider hesitation amongst scholars to wade into the fray on issues related to recent history that are still sensitive.
Leave a Reply