Meta Faces Internal Unrest Amid Policy Changes and Layoffs

Meta, the tech giant formerly known as Facebook, is currently navigating turbulent waters as it implements substantial policy changes that have sparked unease among its employees. These changes include cutting back on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs and loosening moderation standards. The shift has led to a tense internal atmosphere, with many employees feeling disrespected and frustrated by the company's direction.

The situation escalated during an internal chat session where employees criticized Meta for rolling back DEI efforts. Some also accused the company of silencing dissent by dismissing or ignoring internal criticism. Andrew Bosworth, Meta's Chief Technology Officer, responded sharply to these concerns. He suggested that employees who disagree with the new policies or believe it is acceptable to leak information due to such disagreements should consider leaving the company.

"You should quit if you feel that way, I mean it." – Andrew Bosworth

Bosworth's blunt response did not sit well with many employees, contributing to an already charged environment. The ongoing restructuring at Meta has seen the company begin layoffs, which it has termed targeting "low performers." These layoffs have added another layer of controversy to the situation, as many within the organization view them as a move to stifle dissent and reshape the company's culture.

The internal chat session revealed significant unrest within Meta, reflecting broader dissatisfaction with the company's current trajectory. Employees expressed their discontent not only with the policy changes but also with the manner in which these changes were being communicated and implemented. The conversation was marked by tension and highlighted the internal turmoil that Meta is experiencing.

Meta's decision to curtail DEI programs and alter its moderation standards marks a significant shift in its operational strategy. These changes are part of a broader plan to streamline operations and focus on what the company considers core priorities. However, this approach has been met with skepticism and resistance from employees who are concerned about the potential impact on the company's culture and values.