OpenAI has engaged with government officials to address concerns about DeepSeek's AI model training practices. The core of the issue revolves around allegations that DeepSeek improperly obtained data from OpenAI's API to train its AI models. This situation has sparked a broader discussion on intellectual property rights and ethical practices in the AI industry. The investigation is ongoing, with both parties presenting compelling arguments about their respective methods.
OpenAI claims that DeepSeek's approach to AI model training is akin to rebranding a library book and selling it as a new creation. In contrast, OpenAI likens its own methods to the process of reading a library book and learning from it. This analogy highlights the fundamental differences in how each company utilizes data for training purposes. Chris Lehane, OpenAI's chief global affairs officer, emphasized these differences during an interview on Bloomberg TV.
Several publishers have initiated legal action against DeepSeek, accusing the company of using copyrighted works without permission. OpenAI has also taken steps against DeepSeek, alleging that it used OpenAI's API outputs without authorization. These actions are perceived as a form of copyright infringement, prompting OpenAI to seek legal recourse. This legal battle echoes a similar lawsuit filed by The New York Times against OpenAI over copyright concerns.
OpenAI previously asserted that it possessed evidence of DeepSeek's improper use of its data. This claim parallels The New York Times' argument in its case against OpenAI, as both involve allegations of unauthorized data use for AI model training. The ongoing investigations by government officials aim to clarify the legality and ethicality of these practices.
Leave a Reply