As to be expected, OpenAI responded with a counter-suit of their own against Elon Musk. The nonprofit artificial intelligence research organization seeks to prevent what it terms as “additional illegal and discriminatory conduct” by the billionaire entrepreneur. The dispute arises as OpenAI attempts to restructure itself into a public benefit corporation after transitioning to a “capped-profit” model in 2019. The only thing standing between OpenAI and the grave is this change. The company has said it plans to finalize its for-profit conversion by 2025 to retain the massive capital it has raised in recent months.
The growing feud between Musk and OpenAI has escalated in recent months to the public’s eye. Despite being a founding member of the organization, Musk has turned into one of its most prominent critics. To stop OpenAI’s transformation in its tracks, Musk filed a request for a preliminary injunction against the company. In March, a federal judge denied this request, setting the stage for OpenAI to proceed with its plans.
Whatever the final chapter contains, a jury trial is currently scheduled to start in spring of 2026. OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, are listed as defendants in the case filed by Musk. These are the implications of Musk’s actions, which have caused deep alarm among OpenAI’s leaders.
In a statement earlier this month, OpenAI claimed that Musk’s lawsuit poses “a direct and existential threat to our operational code and mission.” They highlighted the extensive harm to their relationships, which would be key to furthering their shared objective of safe AI.
“But Musk’s actions have taken a toll. Should his campaign persist, greater harm is threatened — to OpenAI’s ability to govern in service of its mission, to the relationships that are essential to furthering that mission, and to the public interest.” – OpenAI
The tensions have led to a storm of criticism from multiple national, state, and local organizations. This past week, a broad coalition of nonprofits and labor groups went to bat. They called on California Attorney General Rob Bonta to step in and stop OpenAI’s move to become a for-profit company. They claim that OpenAI has “miseducated and misled the public” and is betraying its stated mission.
Encode is a nonprofit organization that helped co-sponsor California’s SB 1047 AI safety legislation. Sadly, the bill was not able to go over the finish line. They’re far from alone in warning that OpenAI’s pivot might put at risk its promise to lead in developing safe AI technologies.
OpenAI’s recent legal actions reflect their desire not only to defend against Musk’s allegations but to advocate for their future direction. They’re asking for Musk to be restrained from making any further moves that would continue to hurt the organization. More importantly, they want him to be held accountable for the damage he has caused.
“Musk’s continued attacks on OpenAI, culminating most recently in the fake takeover bid designed to disrupt OpenAI’s future, must cease.” – OpenAI
Leave a Reply