They accidentally released a recently surfaced document, signed by Tony Hsieh in 2015, detailing the late Zappos founder’s elaborate estate plans. This remarkable find has now sparked years of bitter litigation between his family heirs. Hsieh tragically died at 46 in November 2020 from injuries suffered in a house fire. He drafted a will with unusual conditions aimed at ensuring that he continued to have a profound and positive influence on the lives of his beneficiaries.
The signed agreement has a no-contest provision. That’s because should any of Hsieh’s four family members contest his wishes, they default to receiving nothing from his estate. This provision strongly caves Hsieh’s desire to have his commands carried out unquestionedly. His will is a testament to his wish for his beneficiaries to “live in the wow.” Equally important, he wants to build in a consistent “WOW factor” to surprise and delight them.
Among the more colorful designations included in the will, Hsieh set aside $3 million for Harvard University, his alma mater. This contribution further demonstrates his deep commitment to public education. It keeps his entrepreneurial spirit alive at the university that helped develop and support his entrepreneurial talent. The will places more than $50 million into secret trusts. These trusts are inextricably linked to beneficiaries that Hsieh wanted to shock.
To further obfuscate the issue, many Las Vegas properties have been assigned to these shadowy trusts. This decision is a fitting testament to Hsieh’s close bond with the city. He created a wonderful community and made Zappos not just a great workplace, but an e-commerce behemoth.
Recent court filings have thrown one such document, signed by Hsieh, into the spotlight. This suggestion is now a major point of contention in the legal wrangling around his estate. A lawsuit between Hsieh’s estate and a former associate has already been settled, yet tensions remain high among family members as they navigate the implications of Hsieh’s wishes.
Even as that legal battle continues to unfold, the circumstances surrounding Hsieh’s will remain fascinating to the public. His groundbreaking approach to estate planning invites reflection on the intersection of our obligations to family members and our culture of self-determination. The no-contest clause imposes a nearly impossible burden on his heirs. This provision might well have a devastating effect on their decision-making regarding the pursuit of any claims against the estate.
Leave a Reply